There have been some questions that continue to arise about the so-called birth certificate for President-Elect Barack Obama. I came across a couple of interesting articles (not in mainstream news) and thought I would post them here for your review. What are your thoughts about this?

Donofrio v Obama Citizenship
Case Moves To New
Supreme Court Level
By Devvy Kidd
11-19-8

Leo Donofrio's case submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court reagrding Obama's citizenship has reached a new level: the case has been "distributed for conference."

On December 5, 2008, only ten days before the electoral college votes, the nine Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court will meet in private to discuss this case identified as:

Leo C. Donofrio, v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey
United States Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407

Leo informed me earlier today via telephone about this historic event and wanted to thank everyone who sent their letters to Justice Clarence Thomas.

This is the link to the Supreme Court showing the docket and action:

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm

If you go to this link, it will give you the process under Title 18:

http://nocriminalcode.blogspot.com/2007/10/petition-distributed-for- conference-on.html

Click on Justices Conference for more history on this process.

This docketing today by the court for this next step should send ripples of fear through the Obama camp. Obama has been proceeding at lighenting speed to put together a cabinet and take possession of the White House with the hope that he won't have to answer the question of whether or not he was "at birth" a "natural born citizen."

Every major news network, print and cable news like FOX, CNN and MSNBC, have ignored all the court cases challenging Obama's eligibility as sore losers or conspiracy theories. It might be in their best interest at this point to report this critically important meeting to take place on December 5, 2008, or lose what little credibility they have left.

Disclaimer

...AND ANOTHER NEWS TIDBIT:

Well, I realize that we are a long way from the year 3,000, but look what humanity has to look forward to! Because of the choice of sexual partners, etc., the human species could divide into a "Sub-species?" Sounds like the potential for radical "elitist" thinking to me. The comment: "The descendants of the genetic upper class would be tall, slim, healthy, attractive, intelligent, and creative and a far cry from the "underclass" humans who would have evolved into dim-witted, ugly, squat goblin-like creatures," is a dead give-away of this "super-society" mindset.

I am currently registered Independent, and while I have not been pleased with Bush's administration, this recent article and audio clip from an interview held by radio host Michael Savage with Philip J. Berg---the former "Democrat" Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania is JOLTING, if true. Berg is suing Presidential candidate Barack Obama for failing to produce the "proper evdience" confirming his American citizenship. Now, I realize that Savage is probably one of the most radically conservative talk show hosts around, but for a Democrat, who has served as a Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and who has worked on many political campaigns to sue Obama, something has to be UP!

Here is the link, and article:

Phil J. Berg on Michael Savage - Audio
Friday, 24 October 2008 17:38 administrator Main - News
E-mail Print PDF

Phil J. Berg appeared on the Michael Savage radio program on October 23rd, 2008.

Here's a link to the audio file. Mr. Berg was on the program for the first hour and thirty minutes.

POST COMMENTS

Last Updated ( Friday, 24 October 2008 17:49 )

Phil J. Berg files motions to expedite resolution in Berg v.. Obama
Thursday, 23 October 2008 14:29 administrator Main - Main
E-mail Print PDF

Plaintiff Phil J. Berg filed two motions today seeking an expedited resolution in Berg v. Obama. (PDF's of the motions are attached below.)

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE

This motion argues that the facts have been established that Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be elected or serve as President of the United States, and that the Court should issue a summary judgment as follows:

* That Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen.
* That he is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States.
* That the Democratic National Committee be enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot.
* That the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency.
* That Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION REQUESTING AN EXPEDITED RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This motion requests that the court:

* Grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
* Order that Defendants Response to Plaintiff=s Motion is to be filed and served upon Plaintiff by a specified date.
* Order that a Ruling, Hearing and/or Resolution be set for a specific date.

Attachments: File Description File size
Download this file (Motion for Expedited Ruling,Hearing, or Resolution re Summary Judgment Motion 10)Motion for Expedited Ruling,Hearing, or Resolution re Summary Judgment Motion 10 76 Kb
Download this file (Obama, Plaintiff\'s Motion for Summary Judgment against Obama and the DNC.pdf)Obama, Plaintiff\'s Motion for Summary Judgment against Obama and the DNC.pdf 250 Kb
Add Comment (100)
Hits: 2243
Last Updated ( Thursday, 23 October 2008 15:14 )

WorldNetDaily: Obama 'admits' Kenyan birth? Campaign doesn't respond to claims in lawsuit over birth certificate
Thursday, 23 October 2008 21:05 administrator Main - News
E-mail Print PDF

October 21, 2008 | By Drew Zahn | © 2008 WorldNetDaily

Pennsylvania Democrat Philip J. Berg, who filed a lawsuit demanding Sen. Barack Obama present proof of his American citizenship, now says that by failing to respond Obama has legally "admitted" to the lawsuit's accusations, including the charge that the Democratic candidate was born in Mombosa, Kenya.

As WND reported, Berg filed suit in U.S. District Court in August, alleging Obama is not a natural-born citizen and is thus ineligible to serve as president of the United States. Though Obama has posted an image of a Hawaii birth certificate online, Berg demands that the court verify the original document, which the Obama campaign has not provided.

Now Berg cites Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states that unless the accused party provides written answer or objection to charges within 30 days, the accused legally admits the matter.

Since Obama has only filed motions to dismiss and has not actually answered the charges in the lawsuit, Berg claims, according to Rule 36, Obama has legally admitted he is not a natural-born citizen.

Now Berg is asking the court for a formal declaration of Obama's admission and asking the Democratic National Committee for another presidential candidate.

In a statement released today, Berg argues that he filed Requests for Admissions on Sept. 15, meaning Obama had until Oct. 15 to answer or face the consequences of Rule 36.

"Obama and the DNC 'admitted,' by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit," Berg's statement reads. "Obama is 'n